- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:48:29 -0700
- To: "ashok malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 00:49:02 UTC
Hi Ashok, At the meeting we focused on LC-2813 which was about access control and failed to formerly address LC-2814. I'm sorry about that, I'm still learning to use the LC tracker and didn't realize there were two separate comments, one for authentication and one for access control. Would you agree that the resolution for LC-2813 also addresses LC-2814 though? RESOLVED: Dispose of LC-2813 by adding a non-normative section on security setting the expectation right, pointing out that this isn't covered in LDP [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/55082/ldp/2813 [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/55082/ldp/2814 [3] http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-09-12#resolution_5 Regards. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2013 00:49:02 UTC