Re: LC-2814 - Authentication

Yes, that's fine.
All the best, Ashok
On 9/16/2013 8:48 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> Hi Ashok,
>
> At the meeting we focused on LC-2813 which was about access control and failed to formerly address LC-2814. I'm sorry about that, I'm still learning to use the LC tracker and didn't realize there were two separate comments, one for authentication and one for access control.
>
> Would you agree that the resolution for LC-2813 also addresses LC-2814 though?
>
> RESOLVED: Dispose of LC-2813 by adding a non-normative section on security setting the expectation right, pointing out that this isn't covered in LDP
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/55082/ldp/2813
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/55082/ldp/2814
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2013/meeting/ldp/2013-09-12#resolution_5
>
> Regards.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group