- From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:31:43 -0400
- To: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAOEr1mMX-fGm41akwRZ-3MvPLznFPS0VgEhGB=ih-XfJR=PHA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Steve, Here is the link to the 'localBiblio' option [1]. You can find an example in the primer here (lines 176 - 201)[2] Best Regards, Nandana [1] - http://www.w3.org/respec/ref.html#localbiblio [2] - https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/file/552bea4141a0/ldp-primer/ldp-primer.html On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya < nmihindu@fi.upm.es> wrote: > Hi, > > After a discussion with Tobie, part of the changes were merged to biblio.json > [1]. Now ldp, LDP, LINKED-DATA-PLATFORM key aliases can be used to refer > to the LDP spec and ldp-ucr and LDP-UCR to refer to UCR doc. > > The documents published by W3C don't need to be added manually as they > will be added automatically using the > http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr.rdf . We can use the > localBiblio [2] configuration of ReSpec to add references to documents that > are not in SpecRef database or override a reference in SpecRef database. > I am using localBiblio option in the Primer to refer to the best > practices and guidelines document and test cases document. > > Best Regards, > Nandana > > [1] - https://github.com/tobie/specref/pull/41 > [2] - http://www.w3.org/respec/ref.html#localbiblio > > > > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I don't see a problem with contributing (pull request) to include these >> references. They look right to me. >> >> - Steve Speicher >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> To have more flexibility the RDF WG has its own local copy of ReSpec, >>> including the biblio. Of course this has its own downside in that updates >>> and improvements to ReSpec don't come for free - someone needs to refresh >>> the local copy every now and then, but I have found it convenient to use. >>> >>> This may be something we should consider doing for the LDP WG. >>> >>> Best regards. >>> -- >>> Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es> >>> To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, >>> Date: 08/27/2013 10:28 PM >>> Subject: Re-Spec references for LDP WG documents >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> At the moment we have three references in biblio.json [1] with >>> keys LINKED-DATA-PLATFORM, ldp, and ldp-ucr. Shall we >>> >>> 1. Unify LINKED-DATA-PLATFORM and ldp into one (using one as an alias) >>> 2. Add references to the best practices guide, primer, and test cases >>> document >>> >>> More concretely, following changes >>> * >>> https://github.com/nandana/specref/commit/aad378fc37fb932985c6bb08b501b4dedd897c3a >>> *<https://github.com/nandana/specref/commit/aad378fc37fb932985c6bb08b501b4dedd897c3a> >>> >>> If that is ok, I can make a pull request to update biblio.json. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Nandana >>> >>> [1] - *https://raw.github.com/tobie/specref/master/biblio.json*<https://raw.github.com/tobie/specref/master/biblio.json> >>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Friday, 13 September 2013 14:32:33 UTC