Re: ldp-ISSUE-81 (Confusing predicate names): [Linked Data Platform Spec]

On Sep 6, 2013, at 03:49 PM, Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

> ldp-ISSUE-81 (onfusing predicate names): Confusing membership*
> predicate names and other possible improvements [Linked Data
> Platform Spec]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/81

Based on åfter-dinner conversation, a suggestion for element
renaming --

         ldp:membershipSubject --> ldp:containmentContainer
       ldp:membershipPredicate --> ldp:containmentRelation
          ldp:membershipObject --> ldp:containmentAddedMember
ldp:membershipPredicateInverse --> ldp:containmentMemberRelation

Just some thoughts...

Regards,

Ted



--
A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Senior Support & Evangelism  //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
         10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
     Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
     LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
     Twitter  -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
     Google+  -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
     Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers