Re: pubrules and ReSpec

Sandro:
I'm afraid I don't like this answer!
If W3C is pushing ReSpec shouldn't ReSpec generated documents automatically pass pubrules
as long as the HTML and Links are correct?   Doing this extra strep is a pain.
All the best, Ashok
On 10/22/2013 7:49 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On 10/22/2013 06:39 AM, Steve Battle wrote:
>> Does anyone have experience experience with pubrules?
>>
>> I’ve done the best I can to make UC&R compatible with pubrules, but it
>> doesn’t appear to be strictly compatible with ReSpec which auto-generates
>> a lot of the content that pubrules complains is missing.
>>
>> Does the ReSpec script have to be compiled out somehow?
>
> Yes.   See http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Tips_on_publishing_ReSpec-based_documents
> for how it's done in RDF-WG.     There's also respec2html if you want command-line, but it has its own complexity.
>
>> Also, should I change specStatus before making the request to the
>> webmaster, or does the document in mercurial remain the editors draft? The
>> status is currently “ED” for Editors Draft,
>
> Make the saved pure-HTML one be WD, and keep the respec one ED.
>> and what _is_ the code for
>> second call working draft?
>
> Sorry, do you mean second last call?   The code for that is the same as last call.   The fact that it's the second one isn't something the system/process cares about.
>
>         -- Sandro
>
>
>>
>> If nobody knows, I'll send what I have to the webmaster.
>> Regards, Steve.
>>
>> -- 
>> Steve Battle
>> Semantic Engineer
>>
>> Mobile: +44 (0)7503 624 613
>> Landline: +44 (0)1173 709 678
>> E-mail: steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk
>> Web: www.sysemia.com
>>
>> Sysemia Limited
>> The Innovation Centre, Bristol & Bath Science Park, Dirac Crescent,
>> Emerson's Green, Bristol BS16 7FR Registered in England and Wales. Company
>> Number: 7555456
>>
>> DISCLAIMER
>> Information contained in this e-mail is intended for the use of the
>> addressee only, and is confidential and may also be privileged. If you
>> receive this message in error, please advise us immediately. If you are
>> not the intended recipient(s), please note that any form of distribution,
>> copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly
>> prohibited and may be unlawful. Attachments to this e-mail may contain
>> software viruses which may damage your systems. Sysemia Ltd have taken
>> reasonable steps to minimise this risk, but we advise that any attachments
>> are virus checked before they are opened.
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2013 13:16:39 UTC