- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 13:16:16 +0100
- To: Arnaud LeHors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On 16 Nov 2013, at 13:04, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > On 15 Nov 2013, at 19:50, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: > >> Here is the agenda for Monday's call. We have a lot to talk about so rest well this weekend. :-) >> >> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.11.18 >> -- >> Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group > > Hi, I'd like a quick initial discussion of ldp:member ISSUE-87, just > so that at least the group is clear about what the intended meaning of this is > so that the arguments in the following pages don't get wasted on misunderstandings. > > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Member > > >> Proposal regarding ISSUE-88: Lost link >> >> • Proposed: Close ISSUE-88 by making ldp:created mandatory when ldp:insertedContentRelation is different from ldp:MemberSubject >> • Section 5.4.14 >> • Related discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Nov/0035.html >> • ISSUE-88: Lost link > > There is another potential solution to the problem that was mentioned. > I have written up the two solutions on a wiki dedicated to this issue: > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Issue-88 >> [edit]Proposal regarding ISSUE-87: Membership triples modification >> >> • Proposed: Close ISSUE-87 by agreeing to do nothing: if the server allows the modification, it is up to the server to decide whether any other changes should be made. > > I wrote up the details of the causes of why this issue arises on the wiki page > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Issue-87 Also ISSUE-88 and ISSUE-87 are related. One cannot choose the "Proposed solution" in 88, ie to "make ldp:created mandatory when ldp:insertedContentRelation is different from ldp:MemberSubject and do nothing about 87. The proposed solution in 88 implies that the client must deduce ldp:member relations from the "membership properties". So anyone changing these MUST be aware of the consequences of these changes. Ie something must be said about 88. > > >> • ISSUE-87: Membership triples modification >> [edit]Discuss Henry's issues >> >> • ISSUE-84 ldp:member >> • ISSUE-85 membershipXXX rules >> • ISSUE-86 "membership triples" misnamed > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Saturday, 16 November 2013 12:16:47 UTC