- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 13:04:38 +0100
- To: Arnaud LeHors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On 15 Nov 2013, at 19:50, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Here is the agenda for Monday's call. We have a lot to talk about so rest well this weekend. :-) > > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.11.18 > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group Hi, I'd like a quick initial discussion of ldp:member ISSUE-87, just so that at least the group is clear about what the intended meaning of this is so that the arguments in the following pages don't get wasted on misunderstandings. http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Member > Proposal regarding ISSUE-88: Lost link > > • Proposed: Close ISSUE-88 by making ldp:created mandatory when ldp:insertedContentRelation is different from ldp:MemberSubject > • Section 5.4.14 > • Related discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Nov/0035.html > • ISSUE-88: Lost link > [edit]Proposal regarding ISSUE-87: Membership triples modification There is another potential solution to the problem that was mentioned. I have written up the two solutions on a wiki dedicated to this issue: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Issue-88 > > • Proposed: Close ISSUE-87 by agreeing to do nothing: if the server allows the modification, it is up to the server to decide whether any other changes should be made. I wrote up the details of the causes of why this issue arises on the wiki page http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Issue-87 > • ISSUE-87: Membership triples modification > [edit]Discuss Henry's issues > > • ISSUE-84 ldp:member > • ISSUE-85 membershipXXX rules > • ISSUE-86 "membership triples" misnamed Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Saturday, 16 November 2013 12:05:11 UTC