W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > November 2013

Re: LDP Agenda for 18 November

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 13:04:38 +0100
Cc: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C72A52E9-B2BD-45F1-8AD1-ABE0716895A5@bblfish.net>
To: Arnaud LeHors <lehors@us.ibm.com>

On 15 Nov 2013, at 19:50, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Here is the agenda for Monday's call. We have a lot to talk about so rest well this weekend. :-) 
> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.11.18
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group

Hi, I'd like a quick initial discussion of ldp:member ISSUE-87, just
so that at least the group is clear about what the intended meaning of this is
so that the arguments in the following pages don't get wasted on misunderstandings.


> Proposal regarding ISSUE-88: Lost link
> 	 Proposed: Close ISSUE-88 by making ldp:created mandatory when ldp:insertedContentRelation is different from ldp:MemberSubject
> 	 Section 5.4.14
> 	 Related discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Nov/0035.html
> 	 ISSUE-88: Lost link
> [edit]Proposal regarding ISSUE-87: Membership triples modification

There is another potential solution to the problem that was mentioned.
I have written up the two solutions on a wiki dedicated to this issue:

> 	 Proposed: Close ISSUE-87 by agreeing to do nothing: if the server allows the modification, it is up to the server to decide whether any other changes should be made.

I wrote up the details of the causes of why this issue arises on the wiki page

> 	 ISSUE-87: Membership triples modification
> [edit]Discuss Henry's issues
> 	 ISSUE-84 ldp:member
> 	 ISSUE-85 membershipXXX rules
> 	 ISSUE-86 "membership triples" misnamed

Social Web Architect
Received on Saturday, 16 November 2013 12:05:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:46 UTC