- From: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:36:15 -0000
- To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>, Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
I thought that "being an LDPR" meant "being a member of an LDPC". Questions about Barbers and people who don't shave themselves notwithstanding, there's at least one LDPC, and hence an LDPR by implication, that is not a member of a LDPC. Steve. -----Original Message----- From: Alexandre Bertails [mailto:bertails@w3.org] Sent: 11 November 2013 16:49 To: Linked Data Platform WG Subject: What does "being a member" mean? Guys, I think we have a problem with semantics :-) Can somebody tell me what "being a member" means? I thought that "being an LDPR" meant "being a member of an LDPC". How is that different from "being managed by an LDPC"? And from "ldp:created"? Are the LDP interactions driven by "being a member" or by "being an LDPC/LDPR"? Is the notion of membership achieved through membershipXXX? If not, what's the name for the feature captured by the membershipXXX relations? If a POST succeed, does it mean that the new resource is created, or managed, or a member of the LDPC? What about a binary resource then, as it's currently not considered as an LDPC? Sorry if those are obvious questions, but when I hear the conversations we have in the meetings, it looks pretty confused :-/ Alexandre.
Received on Monday, 11 November 2013 17:36:44 UTC