- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 13:32:53 +0100
- To: Arnaud LeHors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On 8 Nov 2013, at 05:52, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Now available: > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.11.11 I updated the wiki page http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/ISSUE-81#Proposals_--_Part_I_bis But that does not affect the discussion point for Monday as described by Arnaud: [[ Discuss: ISSUE-81 Part I bis: ldp:membershipRule • Henry suggested that we group all the membership related properties into a separate node • Proposals Part I bis ]] All I did was adapt it to the conclusions I came to in my recent post "volunteering for the army" The proposal still requires a relation to a blank node. It's just that my recent posts showed that we should not think in terms of simple reasoning, but rather in terms of causal/pragmatic consequences. Henry > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Sunday, 10 November 2013 12:33:25 UTC