Re: Which mailing list to use for UC&R comments?

On 11/04/2013 11:36 AM, Steve Battle wrote:
> A process question: Are we asking people to comment on LDP UC&R at
> public-ldp or public-ldp-comments (or both informal/formal?). Or is
> public-ldp-comments just for last call?
> None of the publication announcements I've seen mention a list.
> Steve

The document itself needs to provide a feedback address, according to 
pubrules, and it does.   Unfortunately, it says public-ldp@w3.org.  
That's not what I would have chosen, since it makes it harder to track 
the comments.   But not that much harder, since the traffic on that list 
is low.    Also, we're not formally obligated to respond to all comments 
since it's not Rec Track, but we still should.

     - s

>
> --
> Steve Battle
> Semantic Engineer
>
> Mobile: +44 (0)7503 624 613
> Landline: +44 (0)1173 709 678
> E-mail: steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk
> Web: www.sysemia.com
>
> Sysemia Limited
> The Innovation Centre, Bristol & Bath Science Park, Dirac Crescent,
> Emerson's Green, Bristol BS16 7FR Registered in England and Wales. Company
> Number: 7555456
>
> DISCLAIMER
> Information contained in this e-mail is intended for the use of the
> addressee only, and is confidential and may also be privileged. If you
> receive this message in error, please advise us immediately. If you are
> not the intended recipient(s), please note that any form of distribution,
> copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. Attachments to this e-mail may contain
> software viruses which may damage your systems. Sysemia Ltd have taken
> reasonable steps to minimise this risk, but we advise that any attachments
> are virus checked before they are opened.
>
>

Received on Monday, 4 November 2013 19:09:00 UTC