Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement

On 1 Mar 2013, at 19:40, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> > From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> 
> > To: Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>, 
> > Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org 
> > Date: 03/01/2013 05:41 AM 
> > Subject: Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement 
> > 
> > 
> > On 27 Feb 2013, at 17:22, Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es> wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > >> yes, but I think this could just as well lead one to the opposite
> > >> conclusion, namely that the aggregation model presented recently is
> > >> not intuitive.
> > > 
> > > Well, but aggregation is what we already have in the current 
> > version of the specification (Editor's Draft 27 February 2013).
> > 
> > Oh, I am surprised that was put in, with so little support. I'll need to 
> > look at that closer. But I am not sure it is incompatible with the 
> > prosposition
> > put forward here as argued below...
> > 
> > ...
> 
> Hi Henry, 
> Aggregation was added to the spec as a follow up to the decision to close Issue 34 on February 11. I see no evidence of having "little support". What are you referring to? 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2013-02-11#resolution_3

I some how had a feeling that what was being voted for at that point was 
for it be adopted as a point of discussion to focus on. I did not think that it was 
going into the spec as is.   

Anyway, I don't think this is incompatible with the point I am putting forward here. 

> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
> 
> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/