Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement

> From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
> To: Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>, 
> Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
> Date: 03/01/2013 05:41 AM
> Subject: Re: The Intuitive/ Requirement
> 
> 
> On 27 Feb 2013, at 17:22, Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es> wrote:
> 
> ...
> >> yes, but I think this could just as well lead one to the opposite
> >> conclusion, namely that the aggregation model presented recently is
> >> not intuitive.
> > 
> > Well, but aggregation is what we already have in the current 
> version of the specification (Editor's Draft 27 February 2013).
> 
> Oh, I am surprised that was put in, with so little support. I'll need to 

> look at that closer. But I am not sure it is incompatible with the 
> prosposition
> put forward here as argued below...
> 
> ...

Hi Henry,
Aggregation was added to the spec as a follow up to the decision to close 
Issue 34 on February 11. I see no evidence of having "little support". 
What are you referring to?

http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2013-02-11#resolution_3
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group