Re: Affordances wiki page

Erik, your HTML example strengthens the suspicion that had been growing in 
me about your initial response (paraphrased playback) "the rows on that 
page are not affordances", i.e. about how you were using the word.  As 
you're using it, affordances are at a higher level of abstraction and what 
the wiki page lists (or did, last I looked - on a plane now so unable to 
check) are "just" spec options - things overtly relegated to 
implementation choice.  Those would have an n:m relation with affordances, 
by your definition.  Getting closer?

At least for me sometimes the social definition process requires 
background cycles -- which have been in short supply as I've been gearing 
up for my big annual conference.  Plus the RDF wiki pages I skimmed were 
in some non-obvious notation.

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario