- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:31:29 -0700
- To: Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 10 June 2013 17:32:10 UTC
Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es> wrote on 06/10/2013 09:33:12 AM: > > Hi Arnaud, > > Does your proposal refer to using only Link header or to using both RDF > metadata and Link header (this last for those who care)? > > Or are you just talking about the Link header case? Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean by "RDF metadata" but what I'm trying to do is give each group what it wants. :-) As I said: "If some people want to ignore the Link header they are welcome to do so and it is there for those who care." As long as everybody can live with the solution we are good. > > Kind regards, > > -- > > Dr. Raúl García Castro > http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~rgarcia/ > > Ontology Engineering Group > Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial > Universidad Politécnica de Madrid > Campus de Montegancedo, s/n - Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid > Phone: +34 91 336 36 70 - Fax: +34 91 352 48 19 > -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Monday, 10 June 2013 17:32:10 UTC