- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:51:55 +0200
- To: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 15:52:30 UTC
On 3 Jun 2013, at 07:27, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > <> a ldp:Container; > ldp:contains <member>; > rdf:member <http://ibm.com/cart/23> . > > It helps us if the ldp:contains relation is the default predicate in our spec, because this is the one > most closely related to the protocol. I should really add that I don't believe that the notion of a default relation makes any sense anyway. In RDF whenever you hear "default" something you should have allarm bells ringing: you are then already close to having a monotonicity problem. (That is what ISSUE-75 is about.) ldp:contains just describes the relation that a container has to those things it created. Henry Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Monday, 3 June 2013 15:52:30 UTC