- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:06:52 -0500
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>, Linked Data Platform Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <16F18711-4677-46BD-87A6-54C899EC1E56@3roundstones.com>
On Jan 31, 2013, at 18:01, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > On 31 Jan 2013, at 23:50, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jan 31, 2013, at 13:41, "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com> wrote: >> >>> hello david. >>> >>> On 2013-01-31 19:27 , "David Wood" <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: >>>> On Jan 31, 2013, at 13:18, "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group >>>> Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >>>>> ldp-ISSUE-48 (profiles): Profile mechanism is Needed [Linked Data >>>>> Platform core] >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/48 >>>>> >>>>> Could this problem be addressed by simply requiring that LDP servers >>>>> either advertise a list of vocabularies they support or a statement that >>>>> any vocabularies are acceptable? >>> >>> could you say in a little more detail what you have in mind? advertising >>> vocabularies on the web is done by advertising media types, which is what >>> the original issue was about. if you refer to an RDF-specific mechanism of >>> advertising vocabularies, then that may be unnecessary because the >>> visibility issue is mostly about making LDP visible and discoverable on >>> the web level, and not on the RDF level. >> >> I had in mind a VoID extension, but there are other ways. > > You mean "Describing Linked Datasets with the VoID Vocabulary" ? > > http://www.w3.org/TR/void/ > > Thanks for the pointer. ( a bit diffult to search for on the web :-) > > I don't know what can be done with this, or if it would be the right tool. > Can it be used to specify something like: > > a awol:Entry document should contain an awol:id, and awol:content, etc... > > Mind you, I suppose we can't really progress here unless we have clear use cases > of what is needed. So the problem space needs to be clarified first. Yes and yes :) Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood > > > Henry > >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> -- >> http://about.me/david_wood >> >> >>> >>> cheers, >>> >>> dret. >>> >>> >> > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 23:07:18 UTC