- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:12:10 +0000
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
On 31/01/13 18:27, David Wood wrote: > Hi all, > > On Jan 31, 2013, at 13:18, "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> ldp-ISSUE-48 (profiles): Profile mechanism is Needed [Linked Data Platform core] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/48 >> >> Raised by: Henry Story >> On product: Linked Data Platform core >> >> It has been argued again and again by Erik Wilde on the mailing list [1] that LDP needs a way to be able to specify what types of triples must appear in a graph for a specific resource. Others have argued that one needs this to specify what type of entity should be POSTed to a server. The notion of profiles has come up as name for specifying this [2]. >> >> To my knowledge no such things as profiles are defined clearly for RDF currently, and since Erik argues one cannot use ldp on the Web without such a notion - even for publishing at lpd:Container - it is incumbent on the group to develop the mechanisms to specify this for a graph of any type. >> >> Either that of course or show/argue that this is in fact mistaken. > > > Could this problem be addressed by simply requiring that LDP servers either advertise a list of vocabularies they support or a statement that any vocabularies are acceptable? yes Andy > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > >> >> Henry >> >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Jan/0427.html >> It needs profiles "only if LDP wants to be visible on the web as a service." >> >> [2] the following mail "What are Profiles?" goes into more detail into what they are >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Jan/0339.html >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 20:12:40 UTC