- From: Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:30:56 +0100
- To: Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>
- CC: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Raúl, On 30/01/13 09:17, Raúl García Castro wrote: > As Arnaud says, the issue is not resolved yet. Since in the last telcos > there was not time for discussing it, maybe we can try to advance > discussion here. I've joined the last two calls, that's why I asked. For me we can try to work on the issue by mail, and then discuss it when we'd have time in following calls. > The general opinion in the mailing list is that the servers do not to > restrict any property. Therefore, I propose the following in order to > close the issue: > > .- To remove from 4.4.1 the following statement: > [[ > The only recognized exception are the properties dcterms:modified and > dcterms:creator that are never under client control - BPR servers must > ignore any values of these properties that are provided by the client. > ]] +1 to remove it, sure. Those properties could refer to the actual data, and not to the managed resources. > .- To include in 4.4.1 the following statement: > [[ > However, BPR servers MAY ignore server-managed properties. > ]] > > One example of the need for this second statement is the following: I > upload a photo to flickr and later I try to update this photo saying > that the owner is another person. flickr business logic won't allow me > to do that. I see the use case. Let me think about it, and I'll come back with a more detailed proposal for sec. 4.4.1. Cheers, -- Sergio Fernández Salzburg Research +43 662 2288 318 Jakob-Haringer Strasse 5/II A-5020 Salzburg (Austria) http://www.salzburgresearch.at
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 17:31:47 UTC