Re: MKCOL for making collections

On 1/22/2013 1:04 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> If I got it right, in AtomPub and the model Erik is suggesting we adopt because it would work both for composition and aggregation, a collection doesn't contain member resources directly, it contains entries. Entries can then contain resources (composition) or links to other resources (aggregation).
> The cost of this model is to introduce a level of indirection.

Yes.  I don't see this as a showstopper.
I'm arguing that both models are viable and have pros and cons.
It's a matter of taste.
Ashok