- From: Cody Burleson <cody.burleson@base22.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:44:24 -0600
- To: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CAJM-RdpqZyk9mk1=BMoP3erBY_=61Yg1sj9hzGNVqqLSdEerCA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Nandana, Could you let me know when you wrap up the current round of revisions? I still have an Action to add some new commentary, but I'd rather just wait for you. - Cody On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya < nmihindu@fi.upm.es> wrote: > Thank you SteveS for the review. We are now in the process of addressing > the comments from you and Miguel in the BP document. > > Best Regards, > Nandana > > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>wrote: > >> BP&G Editors, >> >> I did a review of the BP&G document per ACTION-95 and believe this >> completes my action. >> >> I found it useful and easy to read. I do not immediately see any missing >> BP or G, though I'm going through a more detailed analysis of similar work >> at OSLC and will suggest as the come up. >> >> Here are some comments from specific sections. >> >> #Abstract lower case the "I" in Implementing >> >> #2.2 One key motivating case for ensuring 'rdf:type' is explicitly set is >> it helps greatly with efficient and useful queries, such as "Show me all >> bugs that ..." >> >> #2.6 4th para "single document is a acceptable", remove extraneous "a" >> >> #2.8 This sentence isn't valid: >> "The Range column in the tables below identifies the recommended >> rdfs:range for the properties." >> it should be replaced with something such as: >> "The Range/Datatype column in the tables below identifies the >> recommended rdfs:range or rdfs:datatype for the properties." >> >> also should change heading "Range/DataType" to "Range/Datatype" in all >> the table headings. >> >> rdfs:label - the Comment is no longer valid. Even though RDFS defines >> this for use in vocabulary documents, it has become common practice in use >> it as a general purpose label. I'd suggest saying that: "A general purpose >> label". >> >> Regards, >> - Steve Speicher >> > > -- Cody Burleson Enterprise Web Architect, Base22 Mobile: +1 (214) 537-8782 Skype: codyburleson Email: cody@base22.com Blog: codyburleson.com * <http://base22.com>* *Check my free/busy time. <http://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=cody.burleson%40base22.com&ctz=America/Chicago%20>*
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 18:45:12 UTC