W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: Examples in the LDP primer

From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:20:59 -0500
To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CED4832D.12BFB%erik.wilde@emc.com>
On 2013-12-16, 10:11 , "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
>    On 12/16/13 12:31 PM, Roger Menday
>      wrote:
>      Maybe we should be good in the Spec, and be naughty in the
>        Primer ... (?)
>    No, once its naughty it just gets naughtier and harder to rectify.
>    History (e.g., RDF and Web) shows, it can even take 13 or so years
>    to fix the ensuing misconceptions.

agreed that it's different for linked data, but on the web, having
identifiers that do not resolve is perfectly acceptable. that's why
hypermedia links are typed: you follow the ones where the type implies
they're dereferencable, and you only use them as identifiers where the
type implies they are identifiers only.

i am not sure if what roger suggests is to point out that this is what's
natural for the larger web and REST in general. i agree that we should be
careful to promote/show patterns that are not exactly the way how things
should be done in a certain context, but then again, if that demonstrates
how things are done in practice (even though it may not be the ideal way
of doing them), then there might be value in describing those examples as
well.

cheers,

dret.
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 18:21:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:54 UTC