W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > December 2013

Re: ISSUE-90

From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:09:41 -0500
Message-ID: <52A73CC5.3040902@w3.org>
To: Roger Menday <Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
CC: Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On 12/10/2013 09:00 AM, Roger Menday wrote:
>
> Alexandre,
>
> When I first saw your issue 90, I first imagined your motivation was to be clearer about Documents and the Things (which are described in the Document). Actually, the spec is a bit quiet about this kind of thing - for better or worse. So, I was guessing that an LDPG is so named because it is is dereferencable and its contents interpreted as a graph (??)

That was the idea for the name. Sandro suggested something more
general but I can't remember his proposal.

>
> Roger
>
> p.s. on http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Issue-90, I disagree that the "initial RDF Graph is the representation of the POSTed resource". I think that the processor of the POST request is free to interpret the POSTed content in different ways when creating the resource ...

You're right, that'd work only for the PUT, not POST. I'm about to go
through the proposals again and I'll reflect your comment.

Alexandre.

>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 16:09:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:54 UTC