- From: Miguel Esteban Gutiérrez <mesteban@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 14:16:43 +0100
- To: <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002a01cef5aa$11fde360$35f9aa20$@fi.upm.es>
Hi all, I’ve finally completed ACTION-96, the review of the “Best Practice & Guidelines” document ( <https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/96> https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/96). Please find attached the full review report, and let me just share with you the main conclusion. In general, the contents do fit the spirit of the document. But I’m not sure about how they are presented. It is not clear to me where the emphasis is on: does the document target LDP technology developers, consumers, or both? Most of the best practices (if not all) are not related to the LDP specification in itself (do not tackle implementation specific issues) but to the data model that should be used or in the data produced (LDP technology consumer from my point of view). It might be worth thinking about this and clarify the scope in the introduction (impetus) and maybe group the best practices depending on the target of the best practice itself. Cheers, Miguel Descripción: Logo_OEG Miguel Esteban Gutiérrez Ontology Engineering Group Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Informáticos - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid C/ Ciruelos, 2, Boadilla del Monte, 28660 - Madrid - ESPAÑA Phone: +34 91 336 36 70 Fax: +34 91 352 48 19
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
- application/pdf attachment: BP_G_Review_Report.pdf
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 13:17:03 UTC