- From: Miguel Esteban Gutiérrez <mesteban@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 14:16:43 +0100
- To: <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002a01cef5aa$11fde360$35f9aa20$@fi.upm.es>
Hi all,
I’ve finally completed ACTION-96, the review of the “Best Practice &
Guidelines” document
( <https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/96>
https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/96).
Please find attached the full review report, and let me just share with you
the main conclusion.
In general, the contents do fit the spirit of the document. But I’m not sure
about
how they are presented. It is not clear to me where the emphasis is on: does
the
document target LDP technology developers, consumers, or both?
Most of the best practices (if not all) are not related to the LDP
specification
in itself (do not tackle implementation specific issues) but to the data
model that
should be used or in the data produced (LDP technology consumer from my
point of view).
It might be worth thinking about this and clarify the scope in the
introduction (impetus)
and maybe group the best practices depending on the target of the best
practice itself.
Cheers,
Miguel
Descripción: Logo_OEG
Miguel Esteban Gutiérrez
Ontology Engineering Group
Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Informáticos - Universidad
Politécnica de Madrid
C/ Ciruelos, 2, Boadilla del Monte,
28660 - Madrid - ESPAÑA
Phone:
+34 91 336 36 70
Fax:
+34 91 352 48 19
Attachments
- image/png attachment: image001.png
- application/pdf attachment: BP_G_Review_Report.pdf
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 13:17:03 UTC