W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > April 2013

Re: Recommendation for specification edits

From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 10:03:18 -0400
To: Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Cody Burleson <cody.burleson@base22.com>, Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF7942B470.2E7B7CBA-ON85257B4E.004D15B5-85257B4E.004D35E5@us.ibm.com>
> But, what would be the type attribute be for a LDPC ? 
[1] 5.2.7 The representation of a LDPC MUST have rdf:type of ldp:Container
, but it MAY have additional rdf:types. 


[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#general-1 
Editor's draft (but I think the same text is + has been in all the drafts 
all along)

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario




From:   Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
To:     Cody Burleson <cody.burleson@base22.com>, 
Cc:     Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Date:   04/15/2013 09:52 AM
Subject:        Re: Recommendation for specification edits




hi Cody, 

Generally I like this definition of LDPC very much.

However, I would question if a LDPC is actually a LDPR. 
I think these could be different things. 

For example, section 4.1.7 says that an LDPR SHOULD have a type attribute. 

But, what would be the type attribute be for a LDPC ? 

Sorry if I am raking over old coals here ... 

regards
Roger

Current definition of LDPC in editor's draft:

Linked Data Platform Container (LDPC)
An LDPR representing a collection of same-subject, same-predicate triples, 
which are uniquely identified by a URI that responds to client requests 
for creation, modification, and enumeration of its members. 
In my opinion, would be more accurate if stated as such:
Linked Data Platform Container (LDPC)
An LDPR representing a collection of same-subject, same-predicate triples, 
which is uniquely identified by a URI that responds to client requests for 
creation, modification, and enumeration of its members. 
Change: ",which are" to "which is"

Also, it may be more accurate to say "creation, modification, enumeration, 
and removal of its members." (adding removal as a possible operation).

We should also have an explicit definition for an LDPR; I'll try to come 
up with something for starters.

-- 
Cody Burleson
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 14:04:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:46 UTC