Re: Recommendation for specification edits

hi John, 

As a LDPC is a "collection of same-subject, same-predicate triples" does it allow a triple with a rdf:type predicate (?) 

Roger

> > But, what would be the type attribute be for a LDPC ? 
> [1] 5.2.7 The representation of a LDPC MUST have rdf:type of ldp:Container, but it MAY have additional rdf:types. 


> 
> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#general-1  Editor's draft (but I think the same text is + has been in all the drafts all along)
> 
> 
> Best Regards, John
> 
> Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages 
> Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:        Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com> 
> To:        Cody Burleson <cody.burleson@base22.com>, 
> Cc:        Linked Data Platform WG <public-ldp-wg@w3.org> 
> Date:        04/15/2013 09:52 AM 
> Subject:        Re: Recommendation for specification edits 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> hi Cody, 
> 
> Generally I like this definition of LDPC very much. 
> 
> However, I would question if a LDPC is actually a LDPR. 
> I think these could be different things. 
> 
> For example, section 4.1.7 says that an LDPR SHOULD have a type attribute. 
> But, what would be the type attribute be for a LDPC ? 
> 
> Sorry if I am raking over old coals here ... 
> 
> regards 
> Roger 
> 
> Current definition of LDPC in editor's draft: 
> 
> Linked Data Platform Container (LDPC) 
> An LDPR representing a collection of same-subject, same-predicate triples, which are uniquely identified by a URI that responds to client requests for creation, modification, and enumeration of its members. 
> In my opinion, would be more accurate if stated as such: 
> Linked Data Platform Container (LDPC) 
> An LDPR representing a collection of same-subject, same-predicate triples, which is uniquely identified by a URI that responds to client requests for creation, modification, and enumeration of its members. 
> Change: ",which are" to "which is"
> 
> Also, it may be more accurate to say "creation, modification, enumeration, and removal of its members." (adding removal as a possible operation).
> 
> We should also have an explicit definition for an LDPR; I'll try to come up with something for starters.
> 
> -- 
> Cody Burleson 
> 
> 
>