W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Operations on containers

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:38:46 +0200
Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <21E8A6B7-BB4A-49E6-A361-E28934842754@bblfish.net>
To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com

On 19 Oct 2012, at 18:32, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote:

> If I have another usecase.  I have an, already created, resource R which has a URI and I
> want to put it in a container C.  Is that possible

it should be.

you put 

<http://mydomain.com/foaf#me> a foaf:Person .

to 

<http://data.fm/friends>

then you would have 

<http://mydomain.com/foaf#me> a foaf:Person .

in 

<http://data.fm/friends>

if you PUT 

<#me> a foaf:Person 

to

<http://data.fm/friends>

Then you'll have that resources  contain

<http://data.fm/friends#me> a foaf:Person .


> or would the conflation of
> the container URI and resource URI prevent that? 

The new resource you PUT to, would now contain a metnion of the resource R.


> Or would the URI of the resource in
> the container just point to R which could have a different URI?

The above should be the case. If it is not then one should open an issue.

Henry


> All the best, Ashok
> 
> On 10/19/2012 9:22 AM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
>> 
>> "Steve Battle" <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk> wrote on 10/19/2012 08:44:36 AM:
>> 
>> > It's my understanding that The Opacity Axiom
>> > <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#opaque> applies only to clients
>> > attempting to pick apart a URI, rather than to the server.
>> > 
>> 
>> Indeed, but I'm not sure clients could live without knowing the magic involved in this scenario and even more         so in the case of creating a resource using PUT.
>> --
>> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/


Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 16:39:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:32 UTC