- From: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:44:36 +0100
- To: "'Arnaud Le Hors'" <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
From: Arnaud Le Hors [mailto:lehors@us.ibm.com] Sent: 19 October 2012 15:12 To: Steve Battle Cc: 'Andy Seaborne'; public-ldp-wg@w3.org Subject: RE: Operations on containers >>"Steve Battle" <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk> wrote on 10/19/2012 06:31:34 AM: >>. >> e.g. The wording of ' Linked Data Platform 1.0' could be amended to read: >> 5.6.1 If a LDPC server supports deletion of the LDPC, the server may >> also delete contained resources whose hierarchical URIs begin with >> the URI of the container C". > Isn't one supposed to treat URIs as opaque and not parse them? It's my understanding that The Opacity Axiom <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#opaque> applies only to clients attempting to pick apart a URI, rather than to the server. > This may indeed be a very simple and pragmatic way of dealing with this problem though.
Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 15:45:09 UTC