W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: LDP F2F agenda

From: Steve K Speicher <sspeiche@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 22:01:16 -0400
To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF6E26E051.68030B35-ON85257A9C.000AFAF4-85257A9C.000B1A49@us.ibm.com>
Perhaps I could suggest a Day 0 topic: Wednesday evening WG dinner!

A good addition?  Seems like a good way to end plenary day and kick off WG 
activities

Thanks,
Steve Speicher
IBM Rational Software
OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> 
http://open-services.net

Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 10/18/2012 08:06:41 PM:

> From: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, 
> Date: 10/18/2012 08:07 PM
> Subject: LDP F2F agenda
> 
> I've updated the F2F page [1] with objectives for the meeting and a more 

> detailed agenda. I would very much appreciate feedback on these. 
> 
> I found it rather challenging to set a precise agenda at this point but 
I 
> tried to take into account the following: 
> 
> - breaks and lunches are pretty much set by TPAC, although some slight 
> variation is possible 
> - the crux of the work is going to be to start digging into the list of 
> issues we now have and try to make progress on as many of them as 
possible 
> - I'm not sure how many issues we can go through before exhaustion 
starts 
> kicking in though 
> - to allow for remote participation from the US it would be nice to keep 

> some of this stuff to be discussed later rather sooner during the day 
> 
> To try and minimize the exhaustion factor I tried to split heavy topics 
into
> several chunks of time that I mixed with other topics. I didn't go as 
far as
> trying to list which issue will be discussed when though. Allocating 
> specific amount of time to each issue seems too arbitrary at this point 
and 
> I'm thinking we may be better off playing it by ear so that, for 
instance, 
> if we are tired we can tackle an easier issue next. 
> 
> However, if you think differently please let me know. If those who will 
be 
> participating remotely could let me know if there are topics or issues 
they 
> especially care about and at what time it might be more convenient for 
them 
> to have them on the agenda I'll be happy to try and accommodate as much 
as possible. 
> 
> All comments and suggestions are welcome. 
> Thanks. 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/F2F1 
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 02:02:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:32 UTC