- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:34:57 -0700
- To: "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 00:49:00 UTC
Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote on 10/15/2012 08:18:30 AM: > From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> > To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>, > Cc: "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org> > Date: 10/15/2012 08:21 AM > Subject: Re: ldp-ISSUE-24 (remain deleted): Should DELETED resources > remain deleted? [Linked Data Platform core] > > ... > > Therefore, I suggest changing the final subclause to “until a > subsequent action associates a resource with the Request-URI." > This leaves open whether this resource should be the same or different. > I agree. > > These are decisions the server would need to make based on its own > URI management policies, not something it can decide based on the > content of the DELETE message itself. > > Yes, but the spec should leave open what those are. > I think we should recommend against reusing URIs for different > resource though, but not enforce it. > > Best, > > Ruben -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 00:49:00 UTC