W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: ldp-ISSUE-24 (remain deleted): Should DELETED resources remain deleted? [Linked Data Platform core]

From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:34:57 -0700
To: "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF337231F1.9F0C3174-ON88257A9B.0002E3C2-88257A9B.000334C8@us.ibm.com>
Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote on 10/15/2012 08:18:30 AM:

> From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
> To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>, 
> Cc: "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
> Date: 10/15/2012 08:21 AM
> Subject: Re: ldp-ISSUE-24 (remain deleted): Should DELETED resources
> remain deleted? [Linked Data Platform core]
> 
> ...
> 
> Therefore, I suggest changing the final subclause to “until a 
> subsequent action associates a resource with the Request-URI."
> This leaves open whether this resource should be the same or different.
> 

I agree.

> > These are decisions the server would need to make based on its own
> URI management policies, not something it can decide based on the 
> content of the DELETE message itself.
> 
> Yes, but the spec should leave open what those are.
> I think we should recommend against reusing URIs for different 
> resource though, but not enforce it.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Ruben

--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group


Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 00:49:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:17:32 UTC