- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:34:31 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5076D8F7.2030600@openlinksw.com>
On 10/11/12 9:56 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 11/10/12 13:46, Alexandre Bertails wrote: >> But imposing >> absolute URIs to define RDF graph is plain wrong, and highly >> impractical. > > Do you agree the RDF specs do require absolute URIs as those specs are > currently written (or drafted in RDF 1.1)? > > Andy > > > Which ultimately brings us back to the eternally overlooked fact that RDF != Linked Data :-) Links: 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Sep/0003.html -- not too old thread about this distracting RDF and Linked Data conflation matter. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 14:35:01 UTC