- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:54:07 +0200
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <D428C4B3-C13E-4DAB-ADFB-70BE24D981E5@bblfish.net>
On 10 Oct 2012, at 17:22, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi Henry, > > The October 22 deadline was simply driven by the goal of having our FPWD before the face to face meeting and try to stay in sync with the schedule set by our charter [1]. > The plan is merely to publish the current draft, annotated with all the issues that have been raised to date. The editors said they can produce such a document by October 22 so this seems like an achievable goal. > > Do you have any concerns? I was thinking that this was important to have specs in a certain state before TPAC. As the WebID group also has a spec, I was thinking it may also need to be as a Public Working Draft state. Perhaps that makes a difference somehow? > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter#deliverables > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group > > > > > From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> > To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org, > Date: 10/10/2012 05:49 AM > Subject: First Public Working Draft > > > > The deadline for the First Public Working Draft is 22 October. > There was discussion on IRC and during the teleconf about that, > and it seemed like this was a very strict deadline. What was the > reason for that deadline? > > Henry > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 15:54:58 UTC