- From: Kevin Page <kevin.page@oerc.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 17:01:01 +0100
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 16:52 +0100, Steve Battle wrote: > We already use entity tags to ensure that we are updating the current > version of a resource description. Can we extend this to allow access > to earlier versions. > e.g. GET http://example.com/myresource?etag=W/"123456789" Also, are people familiar with Memento? http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vandesompel-memento-04 http://mementoweb.org/ This might be something else where we don't want to prescribe a mechanism within the ldp spec, but ought to consider compatibility and potential problems when working with other common/proposed solutions. cheers, Kevin. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker > > [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] > > Sent: 20 September 2012 08:55 > > To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org > > Subject: ldp-ISSUE-2 (BPR versioning): Do BPR versions get managed in a > > systematic, discoverable way? [Linked Data Platform core] > > > > ldp-ISSUE-2 (BPR versioning): Do BPR versions get managed in a systematic, > > discoverable way? [Linked Data Platform core] > > > > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/2 > > > > Raised by: Andy Seaborne > > On product: Linked Data Platform core > > > > Do BPRs need to be versioned in a standardised way? > > > > Is it one BPR-with-versions or many-BPRs-linked-by-versioning-information? > > > > How does an app reliably find the "latest"? > > > > How does an app discover all the versions for a single BPR? > > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 16:01:32 UTC