- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:40:03 -0800
- To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 17:44:30 UTC
Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com> wrote on 12/13/2012 04:29:47 AM: > I see a difference between 'container contained by container' and > 'container linked to container' (both should be supported in LDP) > ... If a client links a container to another container it is just > linkage, and not necessarily containment. Containment is something > directed/decided by the server, often through creation. > This looks to me like the composition vs aggregation models we've talked about. Per our decision in Lyon our spec is to support composition because this is the only model that requires special treatment by the server. I would expect the same to be true for containers within containers if we were to support that. Some expressed interest in defining a standard way of doing aggregation. Once a proposal is made we can see how this would apply to containers within containers. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 17:44:30 UTC