- From: Wilde, Erik <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:29:52 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
hello all. On 2012-12-13 5:30 , "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: >On 13/12/12 12:29, Roger Menday wrote: >>>>>I see a difference between 'container contained by container' and >>>>>'container linked to container' (both should be supported in LDP) ... >>>>>If a client links a container to another container it is just >>>>>linkage, and not necessarily containment. Containment is something >>>>>directed/decided by the server, often through creation. >That relates to the creation and management of the container, which are >important. >But from just the link to the container, you can't tell? >A container entry is just a link? exactly. as long as the protocol does not need to support special operations, we don't care (or even know) what an entry links to. if you POST an entry to a collection that links to something, that link is opaque to LDP server; it simply stores whatever you have POSTed, and serves it back to you when you ask for it. cheers, dret.
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 17:31:10 UTC