- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:57:52 -0400
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <501FE980.5040102@openlinksw.com>
On 8/6/12 11:13 AM, Erik.Wilde@emc.com wrote: > hello ashok. > > On 2012-08-06 17:03 , "Ashok Malhotra" <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote: >> I am involved in a couple of standards groups where the data is in XML or >> JSON >> and accessed using REST. These folks are wrestling with he same kinds of >> issues >> that motivated us to the start the LDP WG: collections, large amounts of >> data, >> concurrent updates, etc. > yup, that's exactly where we are, and what we hoped to see addressed by > the working group. however, when i raised the issue that with the move to > REST it would make sense to remove the exclusive focus on RDF, the > majority of the WG was of the opinion that we should only focus on RDF. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2012Jul/0029.html is one > of the threads in the archive where i was proposing to include more of > REST. since i have tried already, and should probably tread lightly > because of my status as a co-chair, i decided to not try anymore and > assume that the WG is focusing on RDF. you're of course free to discuss > the issue again, but it seems that so far the majority of the WG is happy > with the RDF focus. > > cheers, > > dret. > > > Is it accurate is I summarize all of this as boiling down to decoupling RDF from Linked Data? As I stated in an earlier post, Linked Data is about: 1. URIs as denotation (naming) mechanism for entities (web, real-world, or abstract) 2. URIs/URLs as identifiers for web resources that describe URI referents 3. Structured Data representation constrained by the EAV/CR or RDF data models + URI behavior described above. There's an artificial barrier created between Linked Data and REST whenever one conflates it with RDF -- which isn't about REST. To conclude, shouldn't this group address the decoupling of Linked and RDF i.e., make the coupling loose? There's everything to gain and nothing to lose. In a sense, the first tangible deliverable from this group could be an official decoupling of Linked Data and RDF. Such a decoupling will ultimately compliment work that will emerge from the current RDF workgroup etc.. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 15:57:01 UTC