- From: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <vrodriguez@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:02:43 +0100
- To: public-ld4lt@w3.org
- Message-ID: <54C0BCB3.6010408@fi.upm.es>
El 21/01/2015 13:19, Jorge Gracia escribió: > Dear all, > > During the last telco (about Metashare and the licenses module) the > following issue was identified: "which namespace do we have to choose > for the new OWL model for representing metadata of language resources?" > The preliminary version of the model by UPF is at > http://purl.org/ms-lod/MetaShare.ttl An alternative namespace has to > be found to avoid collision with the systems they already have in > place. There are several alternatives: > - Metashare-based namespace (at least for the Metashare metadata) > - Linghub-based namespace > - purl-based namespace (or any other generic provider of permanent URLs) --> I think this is for the moment the most flexible, but not the best... > - LD4LT-based namespace --> Who is responsible for this namespace? > - W3C-based namespace > - Other? > > All of them have theirs pros/cons of course. Please feel free to send > your opinion around or to add further alternatives. > > May I ask the group chairs to add this issue into the agenda of > tomorrow's telco? (it shouldn't take more than 10 min I think) > > Best regards, > > -- > Jorge Gracia, PhD > Ontology Engineering Group > Artificial Intelligence Department > Universidad Politécnica de Madrid > http://jogracia.url.ph/web/ -- Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel D3205 - Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial Facultad de Informática Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Campus de Montegancedo s/n Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, Spain Tel. (+34) 91336 3672 Skype: vroddon3
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2015 09:03:12 UTC