[ld4lt] namespace for the model of language resources

Dear all,

During the last telco (about Metashare and the licenses module) the
following issue was identified: "which namespace do we have to choose for
the new OWL model for representing metadata of language resources?"

The preliminary version of the model by UPF is at
http://purl.org/ms-lod/MetaShare.ttl  An alternative namespace has to be
found to avoid collision with the systems they already have in place. There
are several alternatives:
-  Metashare-based namespace (at least for the Metashare metadata)
-  Linghub-based namespace
-  purl-based namespace (or any other generic provider of permanent URLs)
-  LD4LT-based namespace
-  W3C-based namespace
- Other?

All of them have theirs pros/cons of course. Please feel free to send your
opinion around or to add further alternatives.

May I ask the group chairs to add this issue into the agenda of tomorrow's
telco? (it shouldn't take more than 10 min I think)

Best regards,

-- 
Jorge Gracia, PhD
Ontology Engineering Group
Artificial Intelligence Department
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
http://jogracia.url.ph/web/

Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 12:20:20 UTC