- From: Jorge Gracia <jgracia@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:19:36 +0100
- To: public-ld4lt@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANzuSaPcSFLb7gFvQETNXY_NTpm3ksffx6__PgbFCC=W6GRE0A@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, During the last telco (about Metashare and the licenses module) the following issue was identified: "which namespace do we have to choose for the new OWL model for representing metadata of language resources?" The preliminary version of the model by UPF is at http://purl.org/ms-lod/MetaShare.ttl An alternative namespace has to be found to avoid collision with the systems they already have in place. There are several alternatives: - Metashare-based namespace (at least for the Metashare metadata) - Linghub-based namespace - purl-based namespace (or any other generic provider of permanent URLs) - LD4LT-based namespace - W3C-based namespace - Other? All of them have theirs pros/cons of course. Please feel free to send your opinion around or to add further alternatives. May I ask the group chairs to add this issue into the agenda of tomorrow's telco? (it shouldn't take more than 10 min I think) Best regards, -- Jorge Gracia, PhD Ontology Engineering Group Artificial Intelligence Department Universidad Politécnica de Madrid http://jogracia.url.ph/web/
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 12:20:20 UTC