W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ld4lt@w3.org > July 2014

ACTION-7 "Check with w3c groups if there are other approches to represent languages as uris"

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 14:06:09 +0200
Message-Id: <7999C25D-1FF7-45EF-858D-DCD3F2B35D50@w3.org>
To: Linked Data for Language Technology Community Group <public-ld4lt@w3.org>
I did this and was pointed to this proposal was rejected both for RDF 1.0 and RDF 1.1, see for the later this thread
which at least Jose Labra and probably Jorge are already aware of, see

So now we have at least four different approaches for the same purpose websites,


I am wondering what best practice to derive from this - one suggestion was to use owl:sameAs between these in appropriate situations. Thoughts?

- Felix
Received on Friday, 4 July 2014 12:06:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:16:10 UTC