W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-json-ld-wg@w3.org > September 2019

Re: JSON-LD 1.1 update breakout session results

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 06:57:40 +0900
Cc: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C1F6CD3D-21EC-4AD1-8AEC-73AAAA5058E9@greggkellogg.net>
To: Stan Nazarenko <stanislav@binaryorder.com>
Thanks for the update, Stan. We’re trying to find people to help with the Java update. We look forward to a future implementation report for both Java and Go.

Gregg Kellogg

Sent from my iPad

> On Sep 18, 2019, at 5:38 PM, Stan Nazarenko <stanislav@binaryorder.com> wrote:
> Thank you, Gregg and Benjamin.
> My name is Stan Nazarenko. I’m the maintainer of the Go implementation for JSON-LD. We have already made a substantial progress towards supporting 1.1, and it should be feasible to achieve a high level of compliance by the end of the year. We will be working on it.
> As a personal ask, I would love to see the Java implementation updated. This was a major roadblock for us because we use both Go and Java-derived tech in our systems. Without 1.1 support in Java, we had to put the transition to 1.1 on hold.
> Regards,
> Stan
>> On 18 Sep 2019, at 06:17, Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com> wrote:
>> And here are the minutes. ^_^
>> https://www.w3.org/2018/json-ld-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2019/2019-09-18-json-ld
>> Thanks to everyone who came!
>> Benjamin
>> --
>> http://bigbluehat.com/
>> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
>> From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 12:30 AM
>> To: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>; Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
>> Cc: W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>
>> Subject: JSON-LD 1.1 update breakout session results
>> I presented slides at http://json-ld.org/presentations/JSON-LD-Update-TPAC-2019/.
>> We showed the updates to JSON-LD since the 1.0 release in 2014 and described our transition to CR expected in a couple of weeks.
>> There was discussion about reactivating the JSON-LD CG to serve as an advocacy point, and to solicit input on a new JSON-LD timeline for subsequent changes.
>> One area noted was the non-resolution of text direction in both JSON-LD and RDF, which will be discussed in another session. If a solution is found without modifying the RDF data model, potentially the WG could adapt some syntactic sugar to extend the JSON-LD value object to represent text direction more natively.
>> So far, three implementations (Ruby, JavaScript and Python) are targeted to be updated to 1.1, and we’d like to see more. One implementation area of specific interest is C++, and developers are sought.
>> Minutes are at https://www.w3.org/2019/09/18-json-ld-minutes.html.
>> Gregg Kellogg
>> gregg@greggkellogg.net

Received on Thursday, 19 September 2019 21:58:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:15:27 UTC