W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-json-ld-wg@w3.org > September 2019

Re: JSON-LD 1.1 update breakout session results

From: Stan Nazarenko <stanislav@binaryorder.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:38:48 +0100
Message-Id: <81E62572-08F1-435B-881D-454D67ABEB6D@binaryorder.com>
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>
To: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
Thank you, Gregg and Benjamin.

My name is Stan Nazarenko. I’m the maintainer of the Go implementation for JSON-LD. We have already made a substantial progress towards supporting 1.1, and it should be feasible to achieve a high level of compliance by the end of the year. We will be working on it.

As a personal ask, I would love to see the Java implementation updated. This was a major roadblock for us because we use both Go and Java-derived tech in our systems. Without 1.1 support in Java, we had to put the transition to 1.1 on hold.

Regards,
Stan


> On 18 Sep 2019, at 06:17, Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com> wrote:
> 
> And here are the minutes. ^_^
> https://www.w3.org/2018/json-ld-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2019/2019-09-18-json-ld <https://www.w3.org/2018/json-ld-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2019/2019-09-18-json-ld>
> 
> Thanks to everyone who came!
> Benjamin
> --
> http://bigbluehat.com/ <http://bigbluehat.com/>
> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung <http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung>
> From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 12:30 AM
> To: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org <mailto:coralie@w3.org>>; Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org <mailto:dom@w3.org>>
> Cc: W3C JSON-LD Working Group <public-json-ld-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-json-ld-wg@w3.org>>
> Subject: JSON-LD 1.1 update breakout session results
>  
> I presented slides at http://json-ld.org/presentations/JSON-LD-Update-TPAC-2019/ <http://json-ld.org/presentations/JSON-LD-Update-TPAC-2019/>.
> 
> We showed the updates to JSON-LD since the 1.0 release in 2014 and described our transition to CR expected in a couple of weeks.
> 
> There was discussion about reactivating the JSON-LD CG to serve as an advocacy point, and to solicit input on a new JSON-LD timeline for subsequent changes.
> 
> One area noted was the non-resolution of text direction in both JSON-LD and RDF, which will be discussed in another session. If a solution is found without modifying the RDF data model, potentially the WG could adapt some syntactic sugar to extend the JSON-LD value object to represent text direction more natively.
> 
> So far, three implementations (Ruby, JavaScript and Python) are targeted to be updated to 1.1, and we’d like to see more. One implementation area of specific interest is C++, and developers are sought.
> 
> Minutes are at https://www.w3.org/2019/09/18-json-ld-minutes.html <https://www.w3.org/2019/09/18-json-ld-minutes.html>.
> 
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Received on Friday, 20 September 2019 08:01:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 20 September 2019 08:01:38 UTC