Re: APL document publishing via JLReq TF

> On Jan 30, 2019, at 0:16, r12a <ishida@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> On 29/01/2019 11:02, Florian Rivoal wrote:
>> Right. I have a small update to do to the translation, and after that I can submit it to the jlreq TF. What's the best format for you? Raw HTML? Bikeshed? Do you plan to publish it as a WG/IG-Note, or some other format/styling?
>> Let me know how I should prepare it, and I'll get it ready soonish.
> 
> Sounds good. The i18n WG produces all its documents in Respec. We know little about Bikeshed, and struggled the one time we tried to use it. Please can you produce the doc using respec?

Alright, I have done the conversion to ReSpec, styled as an ED, with the links and paths set up assuming it would be hosted in a new repo called github.com/w3c/simple-ruby <http://githum.com/w3c/simple-ruby>. If you can create it and give me commit access, I'll push the draft there. If it should go somewhere else, let me know where. Alternatively, I can send the whole thing as a zip via email, but with dependent resources it is a little heavy, so going direct to Github seems preferable.

—Florian