on version and list of editors for current issue (was: Re: JLReq TF meeting notes 2019 June 12th)

   hi Richard-san, Kida-san

On 2019/06/17 18:03, Yasuo Kida wrote:
> *JLReq TF meeting notes 2019 June 12th*

> *Meeting notes*

> *Status of JLReq update **(**Shimono-san**)*
> 
>   * Status
>       o There are a few remaining open errata: #10 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/10>, #15 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/15>, #18 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/18>, #53 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/53>, #56 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/56>
>   * Consensus
>       o Will fix discrepancies between English and Japanese (like #53 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/53>, #56 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/56>) as they are reported.
>       o Regarding the glossary (#60 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/60>), the agreement is to fix the links.
>   * Actions
>       o Archive images on git-lfs (#63 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/63>). Thank you Xue Fuquiao for suggestions. (Shimono-san)
>       o Fix the links in the glossary (Shimono-san. The GA report is higher priority.)


   For current issue of JLReq document, we agreed during last F2F meeting that the current issue
shall keep as 2nd version with errata fixed but not upgraded with major edits as 3rd version.
   So, we would like
- to keep current editors' draft as 2nd version (with update for contribution)
- to have editors' list of 2nd version as is, and set list of former editors as of 1st version

   If these are acceptable for you, we would like to add an issue and related PR to update the
current editors' draft.


   best,

Received on Monday, 17 June 2019 17:31:41 UTC