- From: Yasuo Kida <kida@mac.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 07:36:05 +0900
- To: 下農 <atsushi@w3.org>
- Cc: public-jlreq-admin@w3.org
I am fine with that approach. Richard, what do you think? - kida > 2019/06/18 2:31、Atsushi Shimono (W3C Team) <atsushi@w3.org>のメール: > > hi Richard-san, Kida-san > > On 2019/06/17 18:03, Yasuo Kida wrote: >> *JLReq TF meeting notes 2019 June 12th* > >> *Meeting notes* > >> *Status of JLReq update **(**Shimono-san**)* >> * Status >> o There are a few remaining open errata: #10 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/10>, #15 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/15>, #18 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/18>, #53 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/53>, #56 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/56> >> * Consensus >> o Will fix discrepancies between English and Japanese (like #53 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/53>, #56 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/56>) as they are reported. >> o Regarding the glossary (#60 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/60>), the agreement is to fix the links. >> * Actions >> o Archive images on git-lfs (#63 <https://github.com/w3c/jlreq/issues/63>). Thank you Xue Fuquiao for suggestions. (Shimono-san) >> o Fix the links in the glossary (Shimono-san. The GA report is higher priority.) > > > For current issue of JLReq document, we agreed during last F2F meeting that the current issue > shall keep as 2nd version with errata fixed but not upgraded with major edits as 3rd version. > So, we would like > - to keep current editors' draft as 2nd version (with update for contribution) > - to have editors' list of 2nd version as is, and set list of former editors as of 1st version > > If these are acceptable for you, we would like to add an issue and related PR to update the > current editors' draft. > > > best, >
Received on Monday, 17 June 2019 22:36:37 UTC