Re: What about this grammar?

"C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> writes:
> For anyone who would like to reduce the focus of ixml on XML as a hub
> format, and generalize it to grammar-driven conversion into arbitrary
> formats, restricting grammars to the XML subset of Unicode is likely to
> feel arbitrary and needlessly restrictive. 

I appreciate the intellectual honesty of “devil’s advocating” for such a
position, but iXML grammars have an XML format. Either we should say
that they do not, or we should assure that they *all* do. I’m opposed to
the former and the latter is easy. So we should do that. (And stop
advocating for devilish things! :-) )

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

--
Norm Tovey-Walsh
Saxonica