- From: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 17:46:09 +0000
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: public-ixml@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2022 17:51:10 UTC
Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> writes: > Some time ago Tom suggested using +"abc" to signal a textual insertion > into the serialisation, which we put on a backburner. But I ended up > thinking about it today anyway. It’s nice. On the whole, I think I prefer “^” to “+”, but the bigger question, I think, is whether not we should be taking this up now. I’d much rather get pragmas sorted out and bedded in before we take on more new work. I also think this example: > data: @xmlns, value+",". > xmlns: +"http://example.com/data". will only fuel more debate about qualified names in V1. “There are no qualified names in vxml” is a reasonable position, I think. But a mechanism that allows for a default namespace binding and no other seems pretty limiting and arbitrary to me. Be seeing you, norm -- Norm Tovey-Walsh Saxonica
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2022 17:51:10 UTC