- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 09:33:56 -0700
- To: Tom Hillman <tom@expertml.com>
- Cc: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>, public-ixml@w3.org
Tom Hillman writes: > On 28 Feb 2022, 13:27 +0000, Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>, wrote: >> >> we already accept that our >> names and XML names are not exactly the same. > I don't think that this is universally accepted! Do you mean (1) it is not universally accepted that this is what the spec currently says, or (2) it is not universally agreed that this is an optimal design? I think that it would be cleaner to say that ixml names are a subset of XML names (or NCNames, as things now stand w.r.t. namespaces), so I'm evidence of (2). But it doesn't keep me awake nights. Michael -- C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Black Mesa Technologies LLC http://blackmesatech.com
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2022 16:34:30 UTC