I'm tempted to agree with the change suggestion, though within XPath
regular expressions, ^ is used for negation, e.g. [^0-9]. And the only
programmatic uses of '~' that sprign to mind are in bitwise operations...
John
On 19/04/2022 12:48, Tom Hillman wrote:
> I do not, myself, much care which symbol to use, so long as we are
> consistent.
>
> However, our responsibility in acting as a committee means that I have
> to represent not only my own concerns, but those of the user base.
>
> I think Norm is right that dismissing the experience of users is not
> in our best interests; I think it is also ignoring our duty to those
> users.
>
> Particularly when the issue has prompted them to contribute to the list.
>
> It feels like there are more arguments being presented to use `!` than
> there are to use `~`.
>
> Tom
>
> _________________
> Tomos Hillman
> eXpertML Ltd
> +44 7793 242058
>
>>>
>>
>>
--
*John Lumley* MA PhD CEng FIEE
john@saxonica.com
on behalf of Saxonica Ltd