- From: Tom Hillman <tom@expertml.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:00:34 +0100
- To: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>, Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Message-ID: <e363d79d-06dd-49c1-aa7b-22bca7352922@Spark>
I'm OK with the syntactic variability, although I will note having the same issues, particularly with `;`. I would be happy with standardising our own usage on '=' and '|'. I think the issues with ambiguity with colons in nonterminal names is resolved well enough with mandatory whitespace after the rule separator. I don't think removing these alternatives is a necessary change, then. But I could live with it. _________________ Tomos Hillman eXpertML Ltd +44 7793 242058 On 18 Apr 2022, 10:27 +0100, Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>, wrote: > Hello, > > I’ve been toying with creating an issue for these ideas, but we need to > be reducing the number of issues at this point, not increasing them, so > I keep talking myself out of it. > > There is unnecessary syntactic variability in ixml that I don’t really > understand. We allow either “:” or “=” as a rule separator and we allow > either “;” or “|” as a alternative separator. > > I don’t think we’re doing our users a service this way. I’m prepared to > believe that there are users who favor “:” and “;” over “=” and “|” (and > perhaps even other pairings) but I have a hard time believing that it > would be make-or-break deal for anyone: “I love the idea of ixml, but I > refuse to use “=” and “|” so I’m not going to use it.” > > I tend to use, and perhaps even prefer “:” and “;”, but I propose that > we adopt “=” and “|” exclusively. > > Using “=” would eliminate the ambiguity caused by colons in nonterminal > names, whether we adopt a proposal to allow that for version 1.0 or > v.Next. > > Using “|” would reduce the syntactic similarity of “sequence” from > “alternate”. On several occasions, I have used “,” where I meant “;” and > it’s hard to see. I don’t think I would be as likely to use “,” where I > meant “|” and if I did, it would be easier to see the difference. This > is especially the case in character classes, where I’m drawn to > [',', '.'] instead of [','; '.']. I’d be better off with [',' | '.'] > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norm Tovey-Walsh > Saxonica
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2022 12:07:33 UTC