- From: iri issue tracker <trac+iri@trac.tools.ietf.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:28:06 -0000
- To: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis@tools.ietf.org, masinter@adobe.com
- Cc: public-iri@w3.org
#117: conformance requirements in bidi document -- do they belong?
The document says "Bidirectional IRIs MUST be rendered by using the
Unicode Bidi IRIs MUST be visually ordered by the Unicode Bidirectional
Bidirectional Algorithm [UNIV6], [UNI9]."
There was significant discussion on the working group mailing list that
this advice should not be normative. If it is normative, it isn't clear
about to whom it applies -- who must do what kind of rendering? And if you
just leave off the "http://" in the first place, is what you're rendering
an IRI or something else?
What is the consequence of not following this bit of advice anyway?
--
------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: masinter@… | Owner: draft-ietf-iri-3987bis@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: 3987bis | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
------------------------+--------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/117>
iri <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/>
Received on Saturday, 10 March 2012 23:28:37 UTC