Re: IRI working group schedule and milestones

Le 11-03-24 14:26, Larry Masinter a écrit :
> Suggest the IRI working group agenda
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/agenda
>
> include 20 minutes to discuss working group charter and milestones.
>

already there! "Next steps". I'll change it to be more explicit.

Marc.

> Note that in the survey
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-56-objection-poll/results
>
> Henri Sivonen wrote: "I strongly object to relying on IRIBIS, because
> the IETF WG has failed to deliver on its promised schedule."
>
> and Edward O Connor wrote: "...the IRIbis spec has failed to provide
> such interfaces. I see little reason to believe that, were this WG to
> accept this proposal, the IRIbis spec would be changed at that time to
> provide these interfaces...."
>
> It is true, as Henri says, the IETF WG has “failed to deliver on its
> promised schedule”. It is also true, as Edward says, that IRIbis
> document does not contain the interfaces suggested in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Apr/0147.html .
>
> It is also true that the IRI working group has seen little or no
> participation from the primary implementers of IRI processors (including
> Henri, Edward or others) and that without such participation, the
> likelihood of timely convergence and progress is slim.
>
> The objective of the agenda item at the IRI working group would be to
> arrive at a realistic schedule for completion of chartered work.
>
> Larry
>
> --
>
> http://larry.masinter.net
>


-- 
=========
IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley. http://www.ipv6book.ca
Stun/Turn server for VoIP NAT-FW traversal: http://numb.viagenie.ca
DTN Implementation: http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64-DNS64 Opensource: http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca

Received on Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:06:19 UTC